Showing posts with label pork consumption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pork consumption. Show all posts

Friday, February 2, 2018

Life with the Pig?


By Nadrat Siddique

February 2, 2018

I love spaghetti and meatballs. They are an ideal carbohydrate offering for endurance athletes like me. I don’t eat them often, and in general, I eat meat at most once a week. The last time I had spaghetti and meatballs prior to the occasion I describe here was 5 – 8 years ago. Eating the fare infrequently, I like it to be high quality.

Recently, I went to Maggiano’s (Italian restaurant) for the dish. It was really good, and nothing seemed amiss about it. A close Christian friend accompanied me. Although he, too, is a runner, likes spaghetti and meatballs, and has ordered them previously at Maggiano’s, he opted for a chicken pasta that day.

The restaurant is an old favorite, and I have been going there for at least a decade.  (By comparison, my friend is quite new to it.) I feel quite comfortable there, and did not think to question the composition of the meatballs.

The very next day, my friend texted me the following: “I called Maggiano’s, and their meatballs are made of beef, pork, bread crumbs, and herb mix. I’m so sorry.”

Referring to another Italian (primarily carryout) restaurant where we’d planned to do our next round of carbo-loading, he said, “I also called Cantina out of curiosity, and theirs are made of ground beef and herbs, no pork!”

My friend, who is not a Muslim, had taken the trouble to call both restaurants to get the low down on the ingredients of their meatballs—all because he knew I am quite serious about my faith, and that it mattered to me! He apologized for my inadvertent consumption of the pork-containing meatballs repeatedly, even though he was clearly not at fault.

The feelings of being besieged by pork and alcohol, which I frequently experience as a Muslim living in the West, surfaced yet again. Two incredibly nutritionally deficient, toxic, and revolting products were introduced, again and again, into facets of Western cuisine where it would seem they had no place, and were completely unnecessary. As Americans’ waistlines burgeoned and the dialysis industry flourished, these twin toxins seemed to have the vast majority of Americans in their vice-like grip. I thanked the Creator for the simplicity of a faith which allowed me avoid such Trojan horses as these.

Simultaneously, I was floored by my friend’s level of conscientiousness. It reminded me of how the Christians of the Prophet‘s (PBUH) time provided strong support for the Muslims, who faced stiff persecution as they went up against the prevailing (pagan Arab) power structure. In fact, it seemed to me that some Christians were better friends of Muslims than some who claimed the title "Muslim."
It also reminded me of the pitfalls of consuming any non-Halal meat. It is a practice I unfortunately do engage in occasionally, consuming the meat after saying “Bismillah.” But—the whole affair reminded me that I must ultimately abandon all non-Halal (ie non-zabiha) meat. And meat, in general, is nutritionally devoid carrion, and ought to be consumed very sparingly, per our Prophet’s example,

Sunday, July 17, 2011

More Reasons Why Not to Eat Pork

Sublime Qur'an Subsumes Science

As a Muslim and a marathoner, I eschew pork following Islamic guidelines on proscribed foods. This, like other Qur’anic injunctions, has helped me to avoid a plethora of health problems, to stay out of the doctor’s office, and to maintain a rigorous athletic regimen free of injury. Recently, I participated in an exchange with friends (and some of their friends) on a social networking site. A young black (Afrocentric) Towson University student—not a Muslim—was recommending to all of his friends not to eat pork. This is an increasingly common phenomenon among activists of color—even those who do not claim the label of Muslim (or who do not claim it openly). Some of these are directly influenced by Qur’anic teachings, by their Muslim friends, or by the writings of Elijah Muhammad such as How to Eat to Live.

Pork and pork products are a major source of health problems in the Black community. Historically, White slavers fed Black slaves chitterlings (or chitlins, for short) and other pork products. Chitterlings are the worse part of the pig--a reminder to the slave that he was lower than an animal, worthy only of eating the slave master’s rubbish. I was proud of my Towson University friend who had thrown off his mental shackles and encouraged others to do the same. But immediately many of his friends assailed his position. Pork is no more deleterious than beef or chicken; some parts of it are white meat and quite lean—and therefore worthy of consumption—they said. Pork is intrinsic to soul food, said others; how can we possibly do away with it? I knew that the instinctive revulsion I felt for pork mightn’t be shared by others, particularly those who were not Muslim, and so determined to find intellectual support for my feelings. Here are the initial findings of my inquiry, which I shared in the course of the online exchange:

Pork takes longer than most foods to digest (4.5 hr, according to some reports). One of the reasons for this: It is rich in residues of the amino acid Proline.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20356084

I'm guessing that the high incidence of Proline, which contains a hetercyclic ring, may be one reason for the difficulty in metabolizing pork. Unfortunately, lengthy retention of food—in this case pork—in a digestive tract that is relatively short (compared to that of most carnivores) leads to elevated colorectal cancer risk.

Additionally, prevalence of Staphyloccus aureus bacteria in pigs is relatively high (e.g., 25-30% in the Netherlands). In fact, locating swine populations not afflicted to some degree by the Staph species in question is highly unlikely.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=first-pork-invades-washington-then-2009-03-12

As a result, very high dosages of antibiotics are administered to most pig populations. So, consumers of pork are partaking of a product, which has been doused with antibiotics. And— by supporting the administration of antibiotics to this animal population, they are inadvertently contributing to the rise of drug-resistant strains of bacteria.

Staphylococcus aureus is thought to be carried by rats in a pig farm setting:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19523703

Unfortunately, the bacterium may be conveyed between the pig and rat population to humans:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19145257

So, the answer seems to be: Either administer massive dosages of antibiotics to pig populations (and then consume the antibiotic-laden pork products)--a strategy which may work in the short term, but has serious long-term implications for the production of drug-resistant strains of Staphyloccus aureus--or find other alternatives to pork products. While it's true that some cuts of pork contain a relatively low lipid content, comparable to those of beef or other meats, given all of the forgoing, as well as the dynamics of pork between White slavers and Black slave descendants, the choice of whether or not to partake of the pig seems rather obvious.